Exploring the Differences Between Adult and Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Why is adult stem cell research less controversial than embryonic stem cell research?
Adult stem cell research has wider medical applications. Stem cells from adults have been found to have a wider range of medical applications compared to embryonic stem cells. This makes adult stem cell research less controversial as it offers a more practical and beneficial approach to treating various medical conditions.
Consent can be obtained from adult stem cell donors. Unlike embryonic stem cells, where consent cannot be obtained from the donor, adults can provide consent for the extraction and use of their stem cells. This ethical consideration makes adult stem cell research more acceptable and less controversial in the medical community.
Donated cadavers can be used to harvest adult stem cells. In some cases, adult stem cells can be harvested from donated cadavers, providing a ethically permissible source of stem cells for research and medical purposes. This eliminates the need for the controversial use of embryos in stem cell research.
Stem cells from adults require no animal experimentation. In comparison to embryonic stem cell research, which may involve the use of animals for experimentation, adult stem cell research can be conducted without the need for animal testing. This aspect makes adult stem cell research more ethically acceptable and less controversial.
Why is consent from adult stem cell donors considered a key factor in reducing the controversy surrounding stem cell research?
The correct option would be B. consent can be obtained from adult stem cell donors. The controversy behind the other option is that it is a form of life, but no consent is taken from the actual life. Consent from adult stem cell donors is crucial in ensuring the ethical use of stem cells for research and medical purposes. By obtaining consent from adult donors, the ethical considerations surrounding stem cell research are addressed and controversies are minimized.