Under which of the following categories would Martha's claim fall?
Final answer: Martha's claim against Super Mower, due to failure to perform as promised, falls under the category of business law, specifically false advertising or breach of warranty. This is because Super Mower misrepresented its product's capabilities in its advertising.
Explanation:
Martha's claim against Super Mower would fall under the category of business law, specifically in the area of false advertising or breach of warranty. False advertising is defined as a misrepresentation of a product or service in some way, such as in this case where the advertisement claimed the product would be the 'last riding mower you ever buy' when in fact, it failed to perform as promised. A breach of warranty, on the other hand, pertains to a failure of a sold product to meet the terms of its warranty. In this case, Martha can claim that Super Mower has failed to honor its promise made through its advertisement, hence breaching its warranty to its customer.