The Fascinating Debate on Hijab: Contrasting Perspectives

What are the different perspectives of the two narrators regarding the hijab?

Amal wears a hijab to please her parents, whereas Allie does not cover her hair because her father has no interest in Muslim identity.

Final answer:

Amal chooses to wear the hijab as a personal choice to represent her faith. Conversely, Allie does not wear a hijab, reflecting the belief of some Muslim women that faith is a personal, intimate matter not requiring outward symbols.

Explanation:

The different perspectives of the two narrators regarding the hijab tie into the broader debate surrounding the use and significance of this piece of clothing in various cultural and religious contexts.

The first narrator, Amal, embraces her Muslim identity and chooses to wear the hijab as a way of expressing her faith and devotion. She is an embodiment of Muslim women who perceive veils as symbols of their cultural identity or religious piety, citing her decision to be personal and voluntary, rather than coerced.

Interestingly, Allie presents a contrasting perspective. Allie does not wear a hijab, reflecting a position among some Muslim women who do not feel the need to outwardly express their faith or see veiling as a symbol of oppression. They believe that their relationship with God is intimate and personal, therefore, does not need to manifest in physical symbols.

← Reflecting on the theme of a former bed and breakfast the linville river farm Reflection on jamal s year of service →