The Governing Style of Andrew Jackson: A Break from Tradition

How did Andrew Jackson's style of governing differ from the presidents who came before him?

Andrew Jackson's style of governing differed from the presidents who came before him in several key ways. Firstly, Jackson was known for his strong belief in the common man and his commitment to expanding white male suffrage, which was a departure from the more elitist approach of previous presidents.

Additionally, Jackson was known for his assertive and aggressive leadership style, often using his executive powers to push his agenda and assert control over the other branches of government.

Finally, Jackson's policies towards American Indians were particularly harsh and resulted in the forcible relocation of several indigenous tribes, such as the Cherokee, on the infamous Trail of Tears.

Final answer:

Andrew Jackson's style of governing differed from previous presidents in his approach to the common man, his assertive leadership style, and his treatment of American Indians.

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson's style of governing differed from the presidents who came before him in several ways. Firstly, Jackson was known for his strong belief in the common man and his commitment to expanding white male suffrage, which was a departure from the more elitist approach of previous presidents. Additionally, Jackson was known for his assertive and aggressive leadership style, often using his executive powers to push his agenda and assert control over the other branches of government. Finally, Jackson's policies towards American Indians were particularly harsh and resulted in the forcible relocation of several indigenous tribes, such as the Cherokee, on the infamous Trail of Tears.

2. How did Andrew Jackson's style of governing differ from the presidents who came before him? Andrew Jackson's style of governing differed from previous presidents in his approach to the common man, his assertive leadership style, and his treatment of American Indians.
← World war i alliances a catalyst for global conflict Why was the work of muckrakers more effective than that of earlier groups →