If Ajax steals the money, what will happen to his family?

From the given statement, "If Ajax steals the money, he will go to jail. If Ajax goes to jail, his family will suffer. Therefore, if Ajax steals the money, his family will suffer." This is an example of:

a) A valid deductive argument
b) An invalid deductive argument
c) A strong inductive argument
d) A weak inductive argument

Final answer:

The given statement is an example of a valid deductive argument.

The statement provides a clear logical sequence where the conclusion directly follows from the premises presented. It establishes a causal relationship between Ajax stealing money, going to jail, and the consequences suffered by his family. This type of argument is considered deductively valid as the conclusion is a necessary result of the premises.

This argument format is commonly used in formal logic to demonstrate the soundness of reasoning and draw logical conclusions based on given premises. In this case, if Ajax steals the money, the subsequent events logically lead to his family suffering, making it a valid deductive argument.

← Convicted of dui understanding the consequences Physical and biological anthropology exploring human variation →