Representation Plans in the Constitutional Convention

What was the main difference between the New Jersey and Virginia Plans? The main difference between the New Jersey and Virginia Plans was the representation in Congress. The New Jersey Plan called for equal representation, while the Virginia Plan called for representation based on population.

In the Constitutional Convention, the New Jersey and Virginia Plans presented contrasting ideas regarding representation in Congress. The New Jersey Plan, supported by smaller states, proposed a unicameral legislature with equal representation for each state. On the other hand, the Virginia Plan, backed by larger states, advocated for a bicameral legislature with representation based on population.

The New Jersey Plan's emphasis on equal representation aimed to protect the interests of smaller states and prevent domination by larger states. In contrast, the Virginia Plan's proportional representation sought to empower larger states and reflect their greater populations in decision-making.

This fundamental difference in approach to representation highlighted the competing interests and concerns of states at the Convention. The debate between the two plans ultimately shaped the structure of Congress and the compromises that would be reached to establish a system of government that balanced the needs of both large and small states.

← Residents not at home in four residences The importance of infrastructure in city growth →