Understanding Julian Rotter's Theory of Locus of Control

How would Julian Rotter characterize Kim's behavior based on the given scenarios? Julian Rotter would say that Kim, who believed he failed his math class because the test was too hard, passed his psychology class because the professor passed every student in the class, and didn't get the internship because the manager didn't like him has an external locus of control.

External locus of control describes a person who believes that he or she cannot influence events and their outcomes, and that events in one's life, whether good or bad, are caused by uncontrollable external factors.

Final answer: Kim's tendency to attribute outcomes to external factors rather than his own actions indicates he has an external locus of control.

Explanation: According to Julian Rotter, Kim exhibited characteristics typical of a person with an external locus of control. This psychological concept suggests that a person with an external locus of control believes that outcomes in their life are largely influenced by external factors, such as luck, fate, or other people, rather than their own efforts or abilities. In the scenarios described, rather than acknowledging personal responsibility, Kim attributed the failure in the math class to the difficulty of the test, the success in the psychology class to the professor, and the rejection from the internship to the manager's personal bias.

← Government officials and monopolies a historical perspective Jobs in southern colonies during the colonial period →

More Posts: